Friday, February 8, 2013

Citizen Media Law Project is PART of the LYNCH Mob that really is Internet Mobbing their Targets, Alleges Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox. Citizen Media Law Project has a Real Boner for Randazza Legal Group, and Innocent TARGETS aKa Defendants Pay the Price. Citizen Media Law Project claims Rakofsky v. The Internet is a SLAPP, yet Totally IGNORE the Real SLAPP District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.


Come on Josephy Rakofsky in Rakofsky v. The Internet is a SLAPP, a Legal Threat to the Citizen Media Law Project Staff writing these "Legal Commentaries", yet the Citizen Media Law Project IGNORES the Real SLAPP District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, the Real "Legal Threat", the REAL Free Speech Threat, Abuse of Power, Violation of Freedom of Expression, and Complete Violation of Due process and constitutional rights of Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and iViewit Founder, Inventor Eliot Bernstein? Why? To Protect WHO? Gee Duh, that is NOT to hard to figure out.

Citizen Media Law Project Staff is JADED, and they Paint a False Picture, in FAVOR of Randazza Legal Group, EVERY TIME.

Seriously, don't you Think that the readers of the Citizen Media Law Site, would be interested in how an intellectual property law firm can have massive Domains Names Taken, Blogs Deleted, and huge FINES, just because some Trademark Attorney sought vengeance? And on top of that make you pay their LEGAL fees to do it ???

Or how about the Case of a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement against a Blogger, ME, and their Buddy at Randazza Legal Group, SEEMING to conspire with, Advise, an Oregon Attorney, David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp, the Opposing Counsel in Obsidian V. Cox, in order to SEIZE a Defendant's Right to Appeal as an Asset to satisfy a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement?

Is this not a MASSIVE Issue that the PUBLIC should Know About?

I, Crystal Cox have personally communicated with the Citizen Media Law Project Staff on this massively important issue and have been ignored. I even sent them the Motion to Stay and the Memorandum, filed by Constitutional Rights Attorney, UCLA Professor Eugene Volokh, that ALL should have, as a research tool for, if this happens to them, yet the Citizen Media Law Project Staff refuses to discuss it, why? Because they are connected to the Internet Mobbing Gang and they are PROTECTING the "False Light". 

For Those Who Want to KNOW about how YOUR Rights to an APPEAL can be STOLEN, Sold at a Sheriff Sale by Unethical ATTORNEY...  and ALL should want to KNOW, here is more information on the Attempt to Steal My Appeal Rights and the Court Documents Involved. 

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/david-s-aman-tonkon-torp-lawyer.html

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/eugene-volokh-ucla-professor-and.html

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/january-2013-obsidian-finance-group-llc.html

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/motion-to-stay-to-stop-david-aman.html

Matthew H. Goldsmith and Joseph Rakofsky Should not Be Sanctioned. Eric Turkewitz, Randazza Legal Group and Alleged Co-Conspirators SHOULD Be Sanctioned and INDICTED for their Massive Fraud on the Courts Says Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.

"1/2/2013 - After a six month period in which plaintiffs did not withdraw their claims as urged by the court at the June 28, 2012 hearing, the defendants represented by the Turkewitz Law Firm and Randazza Legal Group file a motion for sanctions against plaintiffs and attorney Goldsmith for vexatious conduct and frivolous claims."

Source of Quote
http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/rakofsky-v-internet#description

Joseph Rakofsky in the Case, Rakofsky v. The Internet, is not making "Frivolous Claims". He is being Lynched, Set Up, Extorted in a Way, Defamed, Painted in False Light, Harassed, Intimidated, Lied About, Threatened, Mistreated and more.. and these Same Defendants in Rakofsky v. The Internet, many of them are Counter Defendants in a Real "SLAPP" Case known as District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL

There seems to be a Pattern and History with these Journalists, Attorneys, Lawyer Bloggers, Law Firms, and they SHOULD not have Free Reign to Gang Up and Ruin Lives, nor to use their power and privilege to Defame, seemingly legally, and to ruin lives based on lies.

Joseph Rakofsky in the Case, Rakofsky v. The Internet, had the backbone to stand up to them all, and they, in turn, GANG UP, some more, to convince judges, courts, other law firms, and the public at large, via their mirage known as "Legal Commentary" of the "Legal Blogsphere", that Joseph Rakofsky is being "frivolous" and that Joseph Rakofsky and Attorney  Matthew H. Goldsmith SHOULD be Sanctioned. Why? Because they Stood up to a LYNCH MOB.


Pattern and History among, what Looks to be Common Co-Conspirators, Bloggers, Attorneys, Media Outlets in the Case, Rakofsky v. The Internet of Joseph Rakofsky and the Crystal L. Cox Cases of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and District of Oregon CIVIL CASE 3:11-cv-00057-HZ, SHOULD not be taken lightly by Special Investigators. As this "Gang" is POWERFUL in the Media and the Courts, and Joseph Rakofsky is FLAT out TELLING the TRUTH.

These same Defendants in Rakofsky v. The Internet, and many of them are Counter Defendants in a Real "SLAPP" Case known as District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL have also attacked insiders, investigative bloggers, whistle blowers in the Porn Industry Exposing them. The Pattern and History is there. Look at their attack on Shelley Lubben, Monica Foster aKa Alexandria Melody and Diana Grandmason aKa Desi Foxx. They have done this with the First Amendment Coalition, the Free Speech Legal Defense Fund (FSLDF), in effort to SILENCE blogs, online media, investigative bloggers, insiders, whistle blower REPORTING on them. 

In District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL they even named Monica Foster aKa Alexandria Melody and Diana Grandmason aKa Desi Foxx SIMPLY to defame, threaten and harass them when they WERE unrelated to me, investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. They are "related" now, as we are part of a number of individuals ATTACKED by this Internet Mobbing, Gang Stalking Group.

They need to be EXPOSED, Stopped. Instead, for Now, they have Free Reign of the Courts and they Punish whoever they want, in WHATEVER way they want, and have NO Accountability.


Also Check Out These Blogs for More Information

http://www.aribass.com/

http://www.josephrakofsky.com/

http://stateofnevadacase212-cv-02040-gmn-pal.blogspot.com/

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/

http://rakofskyvtheinternet.blogspot.com/

http://ranaankatz.blogspot.com/


This Gang, Gets my Videos, Blogs, Documents Removed Often, and YET pretend to be Supporters of the First Amendment, which clearly they are Hypocritical on.. so if anything is Missing from My Blogs and you want it, email me at one or all of these eMails, as they block those too,  SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com OR ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com or at Crystal@CrystalCox.com  - the LEGAL Blogsphere Gate Keepers, get my blogs removed ALL the TIME, so who knows that will be here or there when you find this blog post.

Ronald D. Green, Alleged Intellectual Property Attorney, LIES to Nevada Courts Deliberately to Defame, Harass, Intimidate Counter Plaintiff / Defendant Crystal Cox. Why is Randazza Legal Group Above the Law? Why Do Counter Defendants of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL use the courts to intimidate, harass, threaten, and attack who ever they please? Who will Stand up to Ronald D. Green and Randazza Legal Group? No One Can, as they Allegedly have Mafia behind them, which is said to include MASSIVE Porn Industry MONEY. Add that to the BILLIONS that Liberty Media Holdings have Backing them, and fighting to STOP The iViewit Story, and there you have it. Attorney Reign of Terror, Internet Mobbing, Gang Stalking and NO Accountability in SIGHT.

Note to Reader: You have my FULL Permission to Re-post my Blog Posts Exposing all ALLEGED Co-Conspirator on any Blog and in their Entirety.

Ronald D. Green, Nevada Attorney, Deliberately lied to Nevada Courts, AGAIN, this time claiming that over a thousands Blogger Blogs cost at least $10 a year, 
knowing full well blogger blogs by Google are FREE.

Ronald D. Green, Nevada Attorney,has Yet AGAIN committed Fraud on the Courts in order to Harass, Intimidate, Defame, Lie about and Paint in False Light Counter Plaintiff / Defendant Crystal Cox. And Yet Ronald D. Green is above the Law as is the Plaintiff, his Boss, the Owner of Randazza Legal Group.

Randazza Legal Group has LIED over and over in the Documents of  District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, yet claims I am using the Docket to Defame them.  I guess Ronald D. Green, Nevada Attorney, thinks that if he repeats the LIE over and over and files it with a federal court, that the Lie becomes the Truth.

Ronald D. Green Lied FLAT OUT, about something so easily proven, and yet has NO ACCOUNTABILITY. Ronald D. Green, Nevada Attorney lied about a Federal “supersedeas bond”.  The court docket easily shows the FACTS, yet, Above the Law Nevada Attorney commits fraud on the court and flat out lies about a “supersedeas bond”.  This was a bond to STOP Counter Defendants / Alleged Co-Conspirators, David S. Aman, Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, Daniel Stanton and Marshall Ross from STEALING, selling of my "Asset", which was / is my "RIGHT to APPEAL".  And this Bond had NOTHING to do with my REAL Assets, Income or anything connected to such.

Yet Ronald D. Green of Randazza Legal Group Flat out lies to the Nevada Courts, and there you have it, must be True Now, because LIAR, Ronald Green says it is. Ronald D. Green of Randazza Legal Group has been an attorney for a long time, surely Ronald D. Green of Randazza Legal Group knows what the court dockets say and what the “supersedeas bond” was actually for, YET he deliberately LIES. Why DO These Attorneys Have the Power to Commit Fraud on the Courts and have no Accountability?

Why do they get to SUE who ever they want, then demand the court make their victims pay their Outrageous $10,000 a Month Legal Fees.

This case was only 2 months In when Ronald D. Green of Randazza Legal Group filed a Default Judgement Against Eliot Bernstein and Demanded $23,000 for his paycheck. WOW, talk about a Racket.

And on top of that, they sit around and decide who gets to own what, and if they can stretch any law, or get away with any lie, well then the will ask for $100,000 for every Free Blog, or Domain Name you even attempt to mention them on. Meanwhile their Internet Mobbing Group is "ALLOWED" to use their company name any ol' time and that PESKY $100,000 and domain name seizure game just don't apply them. GEEZ, seriously? Sure seems to fall under Racketeering, RICO Laws and Flat Out Torment of innocent Defendants, to me. IN my NON-Attorney Opinion.

Keep in Mind Randazza Legal Group, as far as I know, conspired with, advised David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm in attempting to steal my APPEAL. Now they lie to a federal court and say that a “supersedeas bond”, was to stop execution of my assets, when in fact it was only about my right to appeal. They KNOW This.

Randazza Legal Group, Randazza Legal Group DOES not have to obey the law, obey the constitution or even tell the Truth, no accountability what so ever, flat out lies and still allowed to practice law.

They Sue, they Lie, they Commit, Fraud, they Ruin Lives and have No Accountability.

Ronald D. Green, Nevada Attorney, flat out lies about his targets, distorts laws and makes things up purely to intentionally harm his victims, and has no accountability, in fact it seems the courts REWARD him for it, by giving him whatever he asks for.

They Sue whoever they PLEASE. They Pick a Mark, and force their own paychecks in court. Nothing Defendants can do about it, unless they pay BIG money for an Attorney. And that's the luck of the draw, because many in that Circle are connected to each other.

Ronald D. Green, Nevada Attorney, is above the law and uses the court Docket as his personal Whistle Blower Retaliation Revenge, and to intimidate Defendants, then charge them for his $10,000 a month fees to write up fraudulent court documents.

Ronald D. Green, Nevada Attorney, Formerly with Greenberg Traurig who was involved in the iViewit Technology Scandal ( http://www.iviewit.tv/#Evidence ), knows full well what he is LYING About, and continues to LIE with Actual Malice.

Don't Believe Me? Read all the Documents pertaining to District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL. Read where he sues a guy, (Eliot Bernstein), then does not even serve him, but looks to have served a 15 year old instead, then charges the Guy $23,000 in fees for himself. Then charges $500,000 for 5 domain names the man owned and never wrote a word on, claiming the guy infringed on a Trademark that doesn't exist.

Read all the Documents, and Exhibits of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and see if you don't think something fishy is going on. And that these attorneys, simply pick a mark and SUE, then they get a pay day by ordering a Judge to give them a Default Judgement, Judges seize accounts and Attorneys make money on top of money in fraud on the court and abuse of power.

Ronald D. Green Files Fraud on the Courts and Flat Out Lies About Crystal L. Cox in a Motion to Claim that I am not a "Pauper", and therefore it is not the COURTS Duty to Serve all the Counter Defendants of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, when clearly he has falsified the FACTS in many Ways. Really, he is LYING. He is an Attorney, and KNOWS that he is deliberately painting me in false light to further Defame, Harass, Intimidate Me.

Ronald D. Green Files Fraud on the Courts and Flat Out Lies About Crystal L. Cox


Counter Plaintiff /  Defendant Crystal Cox Replies to Ronald D. Green's Motion to STOP the Courts from serving ALL the Counter Defendants in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

Counter Plaintiff / Defendant Crystal Cox Replies to Motion of LIES Filed by Ronald Green



More Regarding the "Bond", the Attempt to Steal My Appeal Rights and the Court Documents Involved. Ronald Green LIED about my Judgement, as it is RECORDED in the County I live in. He lied about the Bond and more, yet has no Accountability.

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/david-s-aman-tonkon-torp-lawyer.html

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/eugene-volokh-ucla-professor-and.html

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/january-2013-obsidian-finance-group-llc.html

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/motion-to-stay-to-stop-david-aman.html


..more coming Soon on this massive Issue Concerning the Public at Large and ALL victims of Ronald D. Green Nevada Attorney, the Legal Satyricon, the Philly Law Blog, Popehat.com, Eric Turkewitz, and More.


Also Check Out

http://www.josephrakofsky.com/

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/

http://stateofnevadacase212-cv-02040-gmn-pal.blogspot.com/

http://www.ranaankatz.com/




Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Mulvihill and Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog INTERNET Mobbing, Organized Crime, Alleged Criminal and Civil Conspiracy / RICO Alleged by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. This Internet Mobbing Gang, with alleged members such as Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, they take one email out of many, they take a facebook post, a judges words out of context or old archived comments and posts they intentionally, maliciously paint a picture in the "legal blogsphere" to RUIN the lives of their targets and get their INTENDED RESULTS. They do this to win court cases, and to wipe out competition, oh and to Remove internet sites Exposing THEM. In my Opinion, and according to my Research and Personal Experience, They are GUILTY of Defamation, Harassment, Criminal Endangerment, Intentional Infliction, RICO Crimes and More. Yet they are a gang of attorneys and they have BIG Media Backing, and huge money such as Jordan Rushie Client Liberty Media Holdings. And therefore They are Above the LAW and will NOT be Found Guilty. YOU LOSE !!


This post in it's Entirety, as with this Entire Blog, is written upon the belief, knowledge, and interpretation of Knowledge of Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. 

Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog is one of many gang stalking, internet mobbing attorneys, bloggers, who work with the Legal Satyricon, and other Internet Mobbing ALLEGED Co-Conspirators  to "shakedown" clients, Defendants, and even their own Plaintiffs (clients), in order to win court cases, remove online competition and Retaliate against Whistle Blowers / Insiders, exposing them.

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog attacks his victims without paying any attention to KNOWN Facts. This is against the LAW and it is NOT protected by the First Amendment, see these gang stalking, internet mobbing attorneys, bloggers, knowingly post FALSE information, with actual malice, to deliberately commit fraud on the courts and create a false version of reality.


Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, Says 
"The legal blogosphere did some more investigating and found it got worse."

Source of


Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog IS a Spineless Coward and is Full of SHIT.

These EVIL Gang Stalkers love to PRETEND they are ALL for the Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Expression, and the First Amendment Rights of ALL. Thing is they are Certainly Not, when those rights ALLOW bloggers, such as me, to expose their alleged ILLEGAL, immoral, unethical activity.
Side Note:   You BOYS Fucked with the WRONG Bitch. I will Fight to the Death. And your constant threats of bye bye, attacks, ruining my life, suppressing me, stealing from me and making me a pauper, well OH WELL. I Fear No Evil and If I Die for THIS, So Be It. At least I will NOT Die a Coward, and the TRUTH will LIVE ON.
So about this torrid, FAKE, love affair these gang stalking, internet mobbing attorneys, bloggers have with the First Amendment: See they LOVE Times vs. Sullivan, GIVES them a Real Boner they CALL a "shimmery force field of First Amendment protection", they have even PULLED it out of their ASSES in their SLAPP suit against me, District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PALas a DEFENSE to my accusing them of DEFAMING ME.

Thing is, Times V. Sullivan seems pretty clear to me that if you KNOWINGLY post False Allegations, with actual malice, then you OWE me a BUNCH of MONEY. You cannot KNOWINGLY post I am guilty of extortion (False Information) when you KNOW (Actual Malice) that I did not commit Extortion, and deliberately, knowingly cause me intentional harm and broadcast this as fact, thereby causing me deliberate, irreparable harm? Then claim a Cloak of Armor in Times Vs. Sullivan, that's PURE hypocritical HOGWASH.

And boy do they know I am not guilty of Extortion, see I emailed the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff, and he claims it to be extortion, oh, or implied extortion you see.. and, well the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff was my attorney for a brief few days, attempting to STOP my Ninth Circuit Appeal of Obsidian V. Cox, and the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff, knew I did not extort anyone.

He had all the emails, all the facts and he knew that there was no investigation, no guilt, yet in a whistle blower retaliation, criminal endangerment, paint in false light, WITH actual malice hate campaign, hate crime, the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff broadcast EVERYWHERE that I was GUILTY of Extortion. the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff had Actual Malice and therefore cannot hide behind the Skirt tails of Times v. Sullivan, though YES I now am a "Public Figure" and all. 

The other ALLEGED Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL knew also, as the information was easily found, one of them Tracey Coenen of Sequenceinc.com - the Fraud Files, even posted on her blog, my comments that I was not under investigation nor convicted of Extortion, but she went ahead and accused me of it anyway. She claims to be a Fraud Investigation EXPERT, yet did not investigate the facts? Or did she and post knowingly? Well she admits on her blog to knowing I say I was not under investigation of Extortion nor convicted of Extortion, so she sure SEEMS to me to be guilty of Defamation, with actual malice. This is just one example of this Internet Mobbing Gang set to ruin lives without facts, but with plenty of ACTUAL MALICE. The worst being Kashmir Hill of Forbes, Portland Oregon Tonkon Torp Attorney David S. Aman, Peter L. Michaelson WIPO Panelist and David Carr of the New York Times.

So you See TIMES vs. Sullivan would not work in a Non-Corrupt Court. 
Luckily, for the Bad Guys, there is NOT one in Site of this Case.

Times v. Sullivan Says"Held: A State cannot, under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, award damages to a public official for defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves "actual malice"--that the statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard of whether it was true or false. Pp. 265-292."

See, the Alleged Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff, YES, did Speak on a "Public Official" interchangeable with "Public Figure", ME, however, I CAN prove they had actual malice, they new, many were insiders in my case and new there were more emails and proof of NO Extortion, new that EXTORTION was not a factor relating to my cases.

Yet they used EXTORTION as a Weapon, as a Reason to RUIN me, Defame me, Lynch Me, put me in danger, steal my intellectual property, deny my rights, and irreparably damage me, and EXTORTION was NOT a factor in my case, nor was I under investigation for EXTORTION, and they all knew this. THEY had Actual Malice, which is Easily Proven to a Neutral, non-Corrupt Court, should one turn up, or even exist.

No worries of them getting an actual judgement for Defaming me, threatening me, stalking me, intimidating me, SEE they are ABOVE the Law and Control the Courts. I don't post this as a woe is me, I want to WIN, I already LOST. I post this to EXPOSE their Big Dumb Asses, and Show you how their SCHEME works, to help you avoid their TIRADE. And to help you to FIGHT BACK.

And when they RULE unethically and conflicted in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, I will be filing criminal complaints as I fully believe they are all acting in conspiracy, and I will be filing a Ninth Circuit Appeal, in order to expose them ALL further, I do this for the Greater Good.

In the Obsidian V. Cox case, my case, they ganged up on me to flat out state over and over that I was guilty of Extortion. Yet I was not even on trial for, nor under investigation for extortion. They then, posted all manner of lies about me and my sources in order to silence me, intimidate me. They even emailed my and gave, not so subtle threats to try and stop me from my Ninth Circuit Appeal as they did not want my precedence to affect their REALITY.

Obsidian V. Cox will change the GAME for ALL Citizen Bloggers, Whistle Blowers, and will level the playing field between traditional journalists and investigative bloggers.

Obsidian V. Cox already creates amazing legal briefs in support to BIG Media having NO Monopoly on Free Speech ANYMORE. Read the Documents of the Appeal, and if you need to know if I am a "scammer", "extortionist" or whatever, in order to believe that bloggers and journalists should have equal protection under the law and the constitution of the United States, then read ALL documented facts of my case to FULLY understand the TRUTH..

If you really care about the original case I was exposing in Obsidian V. Cox, check out





Or just listen to the "Opinion" of your Favorite "Legal Commentary" BLOGGER of the "Legal Blogsphere" and don't think for yourself or read the actual facts. 

Remember Folks, as you read all those "Legal Commentary" Crystal L. Cox Haters, and listen to the "legal blogsphere", first of all think for yourself and secondly remember in the Obsidian V. Cox NINTH Circuit Appeal which is the most important case of our times for Citizen Journalists, Investigative Bloggers, Whistle Blowers and New Media Free Press, that as they TRASH talk me, remember that in an APPEAL, no NEW evidence or argument can come in, and as they spew HATE on how I messed up my Case going Pro SE, realize that the APPEAL is my Case, the Attorney has to use the defense I, myself, preserved in the Lower Court, they cannot enter in new information or evidence. So yes my Attorney, is the Worlds BEST Constitutional Rights Attorney, and he is the ONLY Real, Ethical Constitutional Rights Hero out there, and yes he has presented this case in an ACTUAL Legal Commentary way that will go down in history, however, NOTE that I preserved this defense in my representation of myself. So look DEEPER Then the FAKE, Illusion of "Legal Commentary" of the "Legal Blogsphere" controlled by the ALLEGED Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

See most believe, and even hang on every word of this GANG, that acts as if they are just attorneys from all over the country creating  "Legal Commentary" in the "legal blogsphere" , when the Truth is, they are conspiring, in order to affect certain outcomes to very high DOLLAR legal cases.

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, Breaking Media LLC (AbovetheLaw.com ), Eric Turkewitz of theTurkewitz Law Firm,  J. Malcom DeVoy and the Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group, Mark Bennett of Bennett and Bennett Law Firm and the blog blog.BennettandBennett.com, Scott H. Greenfield of blog.SimpleJustice.us,, Thomas Reuters,NPR Bob Garfield, David Carr of the New York Times, Kashmir Hill of Forbes, Tracy L. Coenen of the Fraud Files Sequenceinc.com,  NewyorkPersonalInjuryAttorneyBlog.com, SiouxsieLaw.com, SaltyDroid.info Jason Jones, Christopher L. Jorgensen and more alleged co-conspirators NEED to be EXPOSED.

To this day, they continue to use their power and knowledge of the "legal blogosphere" to create FALSE, misleading, illusionary "Legal Commentary" to turn into the courts as evidence and to use against their clients, former clients and in retaliation of whistle blowers exposing their dangers, lucrative scheme.

This Internet Mobbing / Gang Stalking Group take one email out of many, they take a facebook post, or old archived comments and then they paint a picture of their victims such as Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and Joseph Rakofsky that is intentionally false. They do this to win court cases, retaliate against whistle blowers and control people they don't like or who compete with them in the search engines.

In my Opinion, and according to my Research and Personal Experience, They are GUILTY of Defamation, Harassment, Criminal Endangerment,Intentional Infliction, RICO Crimes and More. Yet they are a gang of attorneys and they have BIG Media Backing, and huge money such as Jordan Rushie Client Liberty Media Holdings. And therefore They are Above the LAW.

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, Says "The legal blogosphere did some more investigating and found it got worse."

Source of

"legal blogosphere" meaning CONTROLLED Opposition in a way, meaning their version of reality they want the COURTS and the VICTIMS to believe so they get paid larger settlements, and Faster negotiations. Nothing works better for their Settlement Negotiations then for them to harass, intimidate, SLAPP, over bill, pressure, and paint their clients in false light. Especially if it's a, HEY its NOT ME, see its the  "Legal Commentary" of the "legal blogosphere". They said it so it must be true, see Judge, here is my PROOF.. NOT !!!

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, and alleged co-conspirators, control the "legal blogosphere". Another words they ensure that the public at large, those involved in their legal cases, and the judges in those cases, view the details, facts of the matter in small, out of context pieces that benefit their version of reality, to WIN THEIR CASES, underFalse Evidence Appearing Real.

See this "legal blogosphere" attorney lynch mob and their big media and big money connections painting their target in false light intentionally and with actual malice, is "Legal Commentary" according to Judge Gloria M. Navarro in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, and was used to STEAL my life's work, harass me, defame me, intimidate me, paint me in false light, strip me of my First Amendment Rights, Freedom of Expression Rights, Due Process Rights, and Free Speech Rights. All because of False, ALLEGED, "Legal Commentary" from the FAKE, Controlled, Illusion of the "legal blogosphere".

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog is "Captain Obvious", and Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, claimed to do some "investigating" in my case as well. However really Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, "Captain Obvious" posted a Crazy Crystal Cox video and flat out lied about Defendant / Counter Plaintiff Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, posted false statements, targeted a mother of 3, my CPA whisteblower in a 40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy, and continues to use this same KNOWINGLY false information to Defame me, Harass me, Intimidate me.
Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog is is EVIL, and his action, SAYS Defendant / Counter Plaintiff Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, are Criminal, are Racketeering, RICO, and flat out Against the LAW.
And meanwhile Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog is "Captain Obvious", is alleged to be guilty of a Hate Crime in Doing So, as well as Criminal Endangerment in in RICO Violations as it seems that Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog is "Captain Obvious" did the same thing to Joseph Rakofsky.

PHILLY says "Why would the judge say such mean things about Rakofsky on the record? According to Rakofsky:" What a bunch of BULLSHIT, says Blogger Crystal Cox.

 Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog wants you to think, in your fantasy land of the mind, that JUDGES don't lie, judges are not corrupt or conflicted and that no way would a judge IMPLY or flat out say something MEAN, and UNTRUE? Well Yep, it happened in the Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox New Trial Motion DENIAL and it happened in the Joseph Rakofsky case, and I am sure countless others.

This gang stalking Internet Mobbing attorney lynch mob are a powerful group of attorneys. See they get the "Internet", whereby most attorneys and Judges do not. So they simply BLOG the outcome they want in a case, in each others case, in conspiracy to GET them Paid Quicker and to Remove their Competition. Such as in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL., oftentimes they file a legal case, as they have instant access the Electronic Filing Court Docket, and they they use this gang stalking Internet Mobbing attorney lynch mob to paint a picture of their side of the case, BEFORE they even attempt to SERVE their Victims aKa Defendants.

This gang stalking Internet Mobbing attorney lynch mob's behavior is dangerous to their targets. And if you don't understand the "internet", SEO, and the power of the search engines, then you would simply believe this gang of Internet Mobbing attorneys was giving you facts on legal cases, thing is they are no were near neutral on these cases. They are financially involved, connected to each other and they do this over and over as the record shows.

This gang of Internet Mobbing attorneys cannot be stopped, as they are Above the Law, they Control the Courts and they have massive Porn Industry Money behind them disguised as the "First Amendment Protection". And they have insiders at Godaddy, Google, Wordpress, Forbes, Fox News and more big media connections. Add to this Liberty Media Holdings, whom own a massive amount of media companies and Ronald D. Green, his Alleged Mafia Ties Boss, and Jordan Rushie have Liberty Media Holdings as a client.

These THUGS are untouchable, they OWN the courts,
 and whatever domain name, blog, website they want, they will simply take it. Whatever perception they want taken / given / perceived in a lawsuit, they will create the "Legal Commentary" to back it up, on their mirage, fake, paint in false light, IT'S a Set UP "legal blogsphere" blogs.  Then they print out these  "legal blogsphere" / "Legal Commentary" and enter them onto the court docket for a JUDGE, often times, I believe in conspiracy with them, to take these blog printouts as actual documented facts and use them to STEAL massive domain names, wipe out large amounts of online content that exposes them, and gives them and INSTANT massive, unfair advantage in the search engines. See I got to the top of the search engines with dozens of domain names and blogs, and they simply wiped them OUT. No due process, no first amendment adjudication, NO Rights what so ever.

They even use their WINS, their Easily Gotten Preliminary INJUNCTIONS as Instant Precedence for their clients to take other victims blogs and domain names, such as Manwin Vs. Bulgin. Where SUDDENLY the Sucks sites are Trademark Violations when these same attorneys, companies once fought the opposite defense.

This gang of Internet Mobbing attorneys twist the facts, lie to judges, pull archaic laws out their asses to win cases, then take the exact opposite stance to win others, such as the massively hypocritical Ranaan Katz case, let's see are we FOR or against adjudication of the first amendment, I can't remember?  

Let's see are we FOR or against preliminary injunctions, I can't remember? I am a Fucktard Attorney who abuses my power, and commits constant fraud on the courts.. check this one out..



Yet these same Evil Assholes, TOOK my BLOGS, Domain Names, Intellectual property BEFORE and without any  adjudication of the first amendment.

My VALID Objections, IGNORED by a Judge who refuses to Admit or Deny Conflicts






Judge Refuses to Admit Conflict or to Remove herself from My Case. THIS is MY LIFE, I have Rights, and these Assholes just strip me of them for their own personal gain.

""ORDER Granting  Docket Document 2
 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Motion Hearing set for 1/7/2013 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 7D before Judge Gloria M. Navarro re 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 12/28/2012. Replies due by 1/4/2013. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) (Entered:12/17/2012), Document Entry 14




Let's see are we Fucktard Attorneys FOR or against those "Sucks" Sites those Gripe sites, those Parody or Satire Sites, those sites that BITCH about others on the Internet??? Gee, I am a FUCKTARD Plaintiff Puppeteer and I just I can't remember?  

Note who the Hypocritical Fucktard, Puppet Master Attorney Defending this Domain Name is:

GlenBeckRapedANDMurderedAyoungGirlin1990.com 


Side Note:  this guy does NOT defend "Sucks" sites and Parody Sites Anymore. He has recovered from all that First Amendment Nonesense.


Yet this same Puppet Master took my Parody Sites, Satire Sites, Suck Sites.
WOW, must be Nice to OWN THE COURTS.

Let's see are we Fucktard Attorneys FOR or against those those SLAPP Lawsuits, I just can't remember? Check out the Link Below to JOG your Hypocritical Memory.



This gang of Internet Mobbing attorneys flat out lied about a .me domain name and countless others, and because they are Legal Commentary from the Legal Blogsphere, whatever they say is LAW, Facts, and well, ME, with truckloads of documented proof, I am just a BLOGGER, a Woman, and some online Yapper trying to Defame, Take Trademarks and Copyrights by Bitching about the Trademarks and Copyrights Attorney, Gatekeeper Thugs.
Sidenote: Copyright THIS.
Hey Jordan Rushie, Ronald D. Green and the Bitch you Rode in on: Fuck YOU, you Evil, Conniving, Manipulating, Cruel, Life Endangering, Life Ruining, Mother Fuckers.
Personally, I know that I won't Win, District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL  I lost in the first month. They already wiped out massive content, stole domain names, changed and redirected servers, threatened me, harassed me, caused ireparrable harm and all without First Amendment Adjudication of any kind. They even want massive amounts of money in attorney fees and $100,000 for each domain name that existed without there permission, even from Defendant Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Technology who never posted a word on any of them.

The Plaintiff once negotiated as my attorney on these same issues, yet Malpractice seems to be IGNORED. They are ALL above the Law, and you have NO RIGHTS, Period.

If any documents are gone from this post and you want a copy, please eMail me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com OR ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com or at Crystal@CrystalCox.com  - the LEGAL Blogsphere Gate Keepers, get my blogs removed ALL the TIME, so who knows that will be here or there when you find this blog post.

Crystal L. Cox
Pro Se Defendant
Pro Se Counter Plaintiff
Altruistic Investigative Blogger

Sunday, February 3, 2013

The Turkewitz Law Firm, New York Personal Injury Law Blog, Eric Turkewitz BLINDLY Lynching Joseph Rakofsky and whoever his attorney buddies tell him to.

Joseph Rakofsky, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, and the Case of Pattern and History regarding Internet Mobbing, Defamation, Criminal Endangerment, Hate Crime, Criminal and Civil Conspiracy, Intentional Infliction, Intimidation, Harassment, Abuse of Process, Abuse of Privilege and more, by a Gang of Attorneys and their Big Media Connections to INFLUENCE Courts, win Cases, remove competition and in the process violate constitutional and civil rights, deny due process, STOP freedom of expression, REVOKE First Amendment Rights, and ruin lives with no accountability.

Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger Alleges RICO, Racketeering, Pattern and History and Intends to PROVE It. Got a Tip?  Crystal@CrystalCox.com 

"In November, the American Bar Association moved for sanctions. That motion is currently returnable January 17, 2013. Returnable, in this case, simply means that is the day for final submissions. There won’t be oral argument on that, or any other matter, unless the judge specifically asks for it."

"As a caveat, these are simply brief notes. Argument lasted an hour and 40 minutes and Rakofsky was represented by his counsel, Matthew Goldsmsith. Rakofsky was not present. The room was stuffed with lawyers, defendants, summer associates and others. Probably about 40 or so people packed into a small courtroom.

Since many claims overlapped, everyone did not speak. There was no need. The defendants presented arguments first for an hour, and Goldsmith used the last 40 minutes. By the end, the judge indicated that he was considering sanctions."

http://www.newyorkpersonalinjuryattorneyblog.com/category/joseph-rakofsky

Folks this Gang of Attorneys Lynched Joseph Rakofsky, then try and take his license, and sanction him. A group of attorneys are believed, and their lies are massively destructive. They use their attorney lies to violate peoples rights and commit fraud on the courts.  It is a massive abuse of power.

"Randazza waived jurisdiction arguments for many of us (not all), as many want a decision on the merits to preclude Rakofsky suing again in their home states. Those people who live in states with strong anti-SLAPP statutes, however, don’t need a merits decision because if Rakofsky sues them in their home state they have more serious sanctions than New York’s to work with. Our Bannination defendant gets special mention due to a 47 USC 230 immunity argument for an internet forum. Randazza also agued that Rakfosky is a public figure — he tried a murder case and apparently gave at least two interviews to the press — and there is therefore a heightened standard under NYT v. Sullivan."

How is this True when Randazza sues people in any state he wants and completely IGNORES Slapp Laws. And quoting NYT v. Sullivan, AGAIN, really. This Attorney Lynch Mob that The Turkewitz Law Firm, Eric Turkewitz is involved in HAVE actual malice and cannot LEAN on the the NYT v. Sullivan, they are intentionally lynch mobbing their targets in and organized, RICO, fashion as far as I see it.

"Defendant Doudna argued no jurisdiction for him as he is an out-of-state defendant, and moved for sanctions (others are awaiting judicial merits decision before making sanctions motion)."  So I guess I can Sanction Ronald D. Green for Suing me out of Jurisdiction in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

This attorney Lynch Mob is So Hypocritical. But at least Eric Turkewitz was not DUMB enough to actually hire his own law firm, The Turkewitz Law Firm to defend himself, geez talk about a liability.  See that is exactly what is going on with these same PLAYERS in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, where they LYNCH an investigative blogger for exposing them on the INTERNET.

These attorneys, these Defendants of Rakofsky v. The Internet and Counter Defendants of  District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL , they own the courts and justice does not prevail for the ONE standing against the many. They own the judges, WIPO, the First Amendment Bar, and all the connections and "legal commentary" in between, so whatever lie they spread, becomes the facts.


"The proposed Second Amended Complaint weighs in at a staggering 268 pages, with 1,223  separately numbered paragraphs. No, I haven’t read it, but I see that it does contain a brand new tort he calls Internet mobbing, which I understand is a claim that prohibits use of the Internet for criticism and revokes the First Amendment. Feel free to wander amidst the legalese and let me know what these papers actually claim."

http://www.newyorkpersonalinjuryattorneyblog.com/2012/05/rakofsky-moves-to-amend-his-defamation-case.html

Dumbass Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm admits he don't read that shit, he just spews whats fed to him, ain't got time for that thar learnin'. See if Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm actually would read the court documents, he may have a better understanding of the TRUTH, instead of regurgitating what the other "Internet Mobbers" are telling him to say, think, feel, and post.

Joseph Rakofsky Should ALSO add Civil and Criminal Conspiracy, Hate Crime, Painting in False Light, Intimidation, Fraud on the Courts, Denial of Due Process, Abuse of Process, Criminal Endangerment, NOW, with my Story too, RICO and Racketeering as Pattern and History sure is CLEAR to a Neutral, Unbiased, NON-Corrupt, Court System.

Joseph Rakofsky is bringing up a massively important issue. The WORLD need to pay attention to what these Internet Mobbing / Gangstalking attorneys do in connection with Big Media who has a MONOPOLY on Free Speech as the puppet master at the Legal Satyricon once told me. Ahh but no worries as Obsidian Finance Group v. Crystal Cox will Change that. As the REAL Constitutional Rights Hero, Eugene Volokh steps up to the plate, with the merits of my lower court defense, and WINS. Can you hardly wait. oH gee darn, what if he loses, what if I lose my NINTH appeal?? OOPS, you all LOSE way more then I could EVER Imagine.  Gee Darn.  And all those threats, intimidation, tricks, harassment, did not work to STOP my appeal, I feel so bad for you assholes.

Internet Mobbing Is Exactly what the Legal Satyricon, Kashmir Hill of Forbes, AboveTheLaw.com, Jordan Rushie and the Philly Law Blog, J. Malcom DeVoy and the Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group, Mark Bennett of Bennett and Bennett Law Firm and the blog blog.BennettandBennett.com, Scott H. Greenfield of blog.SimpleJustice.us, Jordan Rushie of SaltyDroid, Christopher L. Jorgensen of JackassLetters.com, David Carr of the New York Times, Bob Garfield NPR, LasVegasTribune.com, Tracy L. Coenen of the Fraud Files Sequenceinc.com, Thomas Reuters, and many more are involved in.

Also note that Internet Mobbing and the controlling of the courts, has also let to a decade long suppression of the worlds biggest Technology Theft Story, the iViewit Technology (http://www.iviewit.tv/)

 Internet Mobbing Is what this same group has done to Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, Industry Insider /  Investigative Bloggers Monica Foster, Desi Foxx, Shelley Lubben. And they have done this to Righthaven Victims and many other cases, defendants, where they want to influence the courts or pressure their clients or the clients of another attorney to a settlement, then they get a judge to grant their every wish and FREEZE accounts so those Billable Hours get into the right pocketbooks. THIS IS Very Real. Yet the Gang Stalking, Internet Mobbers create an illusion that it is a Sci-Fi Conspiracy with no factual base. Most courts don't get this "internet thing" so they believe the GROUP of Attorneys Lying to them.

Funny Dumb Ass, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm says above, "which I understand is a claim that prohibits use of the Internet for criticism and revokes the First Amendment". So Dumbass Eric Turkewitz do you understand it to be this or is it really something that REVOKES the First Amendment. See, Eric actually District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and District of Oregon CIVIL CASE 3:11-cv-00057-HZ, are CASES that really do REVOKE, Remove the First Amendment. See they don't want an amazing Investigative Blogger getting on top of the search engine with the documented facts of their corruption so they REVOKE her First Amendment Rights. And dumb ass Internet Mobbing groupies like you, simply follow along with no clue as the actual merits of the case. Guess I get it now, you DON'T read the case documents, you just do what the Puppeteer of the Legal Satyricon TELLS ya to. Dumb Move There. To bad you did not think for yourself, and read the documents, now your being SUED, Exposed.

More coming soon on the total Liability that Dumbass Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm has created for himself and the danger and ruin he has put Joseph Rakofsky and Crystal Cox in. Stay Tuned ~ Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger Alleges RICO, Racketeering, Pattern and History and Intends to PROVE It. Got a Tip?  Crystal@CrystalCox.com